Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,483,075 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $53,806, a difference of 61.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $118,056, a difference of 56.1%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $125,150, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $57,123, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $69,872, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 89.0%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 85.4%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 71.7%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 69.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.22, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 123.8%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 122.2%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 109.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 90.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 74.3%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%).