Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,545,740 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 27.4 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $53,806, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $118,056, a difference of 38.0%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $66,903, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $57,123, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $69,872, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 65.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 115.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 102.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.0%).