Panamanian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,044,209 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to a decrease of 70.2 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $118,056, a difference of 30.9%), median family income ($97,683 compared to $125,150, a difference of 28.1%), and per capita income ($42,035 compared to $53,806, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $57,123, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $46,502, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.42%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.7%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.93%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 78.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 58.6%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.4%).