Bermudan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,294,443 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 116.7 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $118,056, a difference of 33.8%), median household income ($80,406 compared to $104,796, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $122,222, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 17.1%), median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $46,502, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $69,872, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.1%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.8%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.79%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 60.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.9%).