Austrian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,031,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to a decrease of 71.1 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $118,056, a difference of 15.9%), median household income ($91,339 compared to $104,796, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $46,502, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $69,872, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $57,123, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).