Asian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Asians
Chickasaw
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 534,134,882 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 43.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.7% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 35.8% |
| Median | 16.0% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Asians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |