Asian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Asians
Chickasaw
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 33.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 38.6% |
| Range | 20.0% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 18.1% |
| Median | 10.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |