Samoan vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Samoan
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Samoans
Choctaw
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Samoan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,377,966 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 120.0 Choctaw.
Samoan vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,498 compared to $69,947, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $82,287, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $53,060, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $47,729, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $40,270, a difference of 9.8%).
Income Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,826 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,344 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,498 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,206 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,389 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,498 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,610 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,385 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,580 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,427 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Tragic 28.1% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 50.1%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.6%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 78.2% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (67.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.6% | Tragic 36.9% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.8%), associate's degree (41.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.0% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Samoan vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.5%).
Disability Metric | Samoan | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |