Arapaho vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Choctaw
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,327,218 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.141% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 141.1 Choctaw.
Arapaho vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $47,729, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $53,060, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $69,947, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $45,450, a difference of 3.3%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $84,835, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 28.1% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 99.5%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 78.2% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.7%), currently married (40.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.21, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 36.9% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Arapaho vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |