Romanian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Choctaw

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,370,290 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.187% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 187.4 Choctaw.
Romanian Integration in Choctaw Communities

Romanian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $35,999, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $82,287, a difference of 32.0%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $69,947, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $53,060, a difference of 20.9%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricRomanianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.1%

Romanian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.3%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.6%

Romanian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Romanian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
78.2%

Romanian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianChoctaw
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.9%

Romanian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Romanian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.6%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 55.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Romanian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.3%).
Romanian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricRomanianChoctaw
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%