Finnish vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,290,765 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $82,287, a difference of 21.4%), median family income ($102,676 compared to $84,835, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $78,168, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $53,060, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $33,775, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 51.3%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.2%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.6%).