Crow vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,057,556 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 34.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 47.6%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,999, a difference of 13.5%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $47,729, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $45,450, a difference of 3.4%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,270, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $33,775, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 51.9%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 46.1%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 246.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 241.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 196.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.5%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.21, a difference of 19.0%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.17%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.5%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.25%), associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.1%).