Welsh vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,625,355 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 49.8 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,322 compared to $82,287, a difference of 21.9%), median family income ($102,151 compared to $84,835, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($43,233 compared to $35,999, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,597 compared to $45,450, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $33,775, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 45.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.79%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.2%).