Immigrants from Jordan vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,126,824 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $82,287, a difference of 29.0%), median household income ($89,412 compared to $69,947, a difference of 27.8%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $84,835, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $45,450, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $53,060, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 46.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 46.1%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.9%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.9% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.3%).