Sioux vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,251,047 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 15.7%), per capita income ($33,921 compared to $35,999, a difference of 6.1%), and median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $47,729, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,750 compared to $82,287, a difference of 0.66%), householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $53,060, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $78,168, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.2%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (26.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and single female poverty (31.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.3%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.14%), college, under 1 year (59.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.7%).