Russian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Russian
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Russians
Chickasaw
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,147,306 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.080%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 40.0% |
Range | 98.9% | 38.3% |
Mean | 18.4% | 14.2% |
Median | 10.8% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 92.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Romanians | 92.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 91.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
Ukrainians | 86.9 /100 | #114 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |