Russian vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Chickasaw
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Russians
Chickasaw
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,513,768 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 34.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 64.7% | 17.6% |
| Range | 63.1% | 16.0% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 7.8% |
| Median | 4.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Russians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |