Lithuanian vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,375,319 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 85.4 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $50,077, a difference of 30.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $87,580, a difference of 28.4%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $91,848, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,387, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $38,614, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $44,640, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 118.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.6%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 62.9%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 39.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 84.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 115.7%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.8%).