Lithuanian vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Samoans
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,583,496 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 35.7 Samoans.
Lithuanian vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $39,826, a difference of 24.2%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $51,389, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $44,206, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $65,427, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $54,610, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $86,498, a difference of 8.5%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Fair 26.0% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.2%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Fair 12.1% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.4% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 81.8% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.45%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Fair 32.6% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.9%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Lithuanian vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.41%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Samoan |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |