Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,092,066 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 32.0 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $62,939, a difference of 12.5%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $47,489, a difference of 12.0%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $109,975, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $56,168, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $101,091, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 32.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.4%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.9%).