Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,408,336 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.762. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 281.1 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $48,844, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $102,020, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,277, a difference of 0.73%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,817, a difference of 0.87%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $49,722, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.3%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.66%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 7.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.2%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%).