Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,210,423 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 77.2 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $55,924, a difference of 12.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $99,203, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $100,984, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $95,512, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $47,304, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.6%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 7.1%).