Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,549,993 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 30.7 Immigrants from Nigeria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $86,589, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $94,804, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $39,294, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $49,174, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $58,942, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.6%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.9%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%).