Immigrants from Jordan vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Chinese
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,249,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 24.9%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 29.4% |
Range | 28.5% | 28.2% |
Mean | 11.0% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.5% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |