Immigrants from Jordan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,872,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 40.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Chinese
Minimum	1.7%	0.44%
Maximum	25.3%	17.1%
Range	23.5%	16.7%
Mean	6.5%	4.2%
Median	4.6%	3.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.7%	2.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.3%	4.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.9%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.9%	3.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%
Ottawa	54.5 /100 \| #169	Average 5.2%

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 3.6%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 3.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 3.7%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 3.8%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 3.9%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 3.9%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 3.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 3.9%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 3.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 3.9%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.0%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%