French Canadian vs Immigrants from Venezuela Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,948,789 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Venezuela. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from Venezuela.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $87,038, a difference of 7.6%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $94,904, a difference of 7.1%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $57,371, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $81,506, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $41,727, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 29.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.35%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.8%).