French Canadian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,252,878 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,810 compared to $99,943, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $119,094, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $69,426, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,512, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $44,161, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 12.6%).