French Canadian vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,567,091 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 39.2 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $54,159, a difference of 25.9%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $99,813, a difference of 20.5%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $121,840, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,571, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $44,366, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.28%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%).