Aleut vs Chickasaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Aleut
Chickasaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Aleuts
Chickasaw
12.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Chickasaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,781,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,688,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 19.7%.
![Aleut vs Chickasaw Female Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-disability/aleuts-vs-chickasaw-female-disability-chart.webp)
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.5% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 45.6% |
Range | 57.5% | 41.0% |
Mean | 14.9% | 21.5% |
Median | 12.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 25.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Liberian (12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), British West Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Subsaharan African (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Germany (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Crow | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.7% |
Jamaicans | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.7% |
Hawaiians | 1.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.7% |
British West Indians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.7% |
Liberians | 1.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.7% |
Aleuts | 1.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 1.0 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.0 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.7% |
Bermudans | 1.0 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.9 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.7% |
Spaniards | 0.7 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaska Natives | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.8% |
West Indians | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |