Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,931,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.312% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 312.0 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.3%), per capita income ($52,217 compared to $46,430, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $97,305, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $42,229, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($51,758 compared to $49,368, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $54,593, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.19%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.13%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.86%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%).