Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,189,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.403% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 403.1 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($53,799 compared to $46,430, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,000 compared to $102,015, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $42,229, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $54,593, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($53,186 compared to $49,368, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.39%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.94%), family households (62.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.82%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%).