Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,530,224 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.684% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 684.2 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $46,430, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $102,015, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $54,593, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $42,229, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $49,368, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.79%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.7%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%).