Northern European vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,966,885 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 54.4 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,635 compared to $105,507, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,457 compared to $95,913, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $103,282, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $51,190, a difference of 0.95%), median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $39,603, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 7.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.0%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.73%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.0%).