Northern European vs Immigrants from Colombia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,950,083 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Colombia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 161.3 Immigrants from Colombia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.3%), median family income ($110,635 compared to $98,067, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $57,658, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $53,714, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $38,913, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($48,887 compared to $45,550, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.47%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%).