Northern European vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,322,501 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 202.0 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $42,386, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $53,990, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,635 compared to $110,137, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $107,378, a difference of 0.46%), and median household income ($90,446 compared to $91,015, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 70.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.5%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and bachelor's degree (41.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.99%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%).