Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,796,442 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 57.0 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $54,474, a difference of 12.3%), per capita income ($43,838 compared to $39,372, a difference of 11.3%), and median family income ($102,451 compared to $92,231, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $53,275, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $87,751, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.66%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.2%), family households (61.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).