Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Chickasaw
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,458,844 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 38.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 18.7% | 33.3% |
| Range | 17.0% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 12.7% |
| Median | 6.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |