Immigrants from Croatia vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,783,178 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 32.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $37,699, a difference of 33.7%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $47,433, a difference of 28.4%), and median family income ($112,323 compared to $88,034, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $48,643, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $53,232, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 82.1%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 71.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.35, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.6%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 11.0%).