Immigrants from Croatia vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,094,279 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.210% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 1,209.5 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $40,244, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $85,899, a difference of 21.7%), and median family income ($112,323 compared to $92,872, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $48,977, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $54,699, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.5%), no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.3%), master's degree (17.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.2%).