Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,001,899 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.253% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 253.0 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $45,979, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $58,452, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($51,581 compared to $49,633, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($92,225 compared to $90,549, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $106,319, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.050%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.25%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).