Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Chickasaw
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,440,567 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 20.0% |
| Range | 39.5% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Romania (5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from South Africa (5.1%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.3 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 88.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 87.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |