Immigrants vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,610,954 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Apache within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $34,886, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $82,184, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($85,818 compared to $70,927, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $49,395, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $54,668, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 70.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 52.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 71.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (66.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.46, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.74%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 11.3%).