Ecuadorian vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,255,869 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $34,886, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $70,927, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $80,260, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,668, a difference of 0.53%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $49,395, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 72.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 47.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 55.8%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 106.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 87.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and 11th grade (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 85.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.1%).