Australian vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,607,174 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.141% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 141.4 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $34,886, a difference of 49.3%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $84,451, a difference of 40.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $82,184, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $49,395, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $54,668, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 107.7%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 90.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.7%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 88.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 71.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.4%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 67.7%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 66.1%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.8%).