Chinese vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,943,549 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,668, a difference of 41.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $82,184, a difference of 41.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,927, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,395, a difference of 17.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,895, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 145.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 126.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 106.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 48.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 57.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 62.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 95.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 81.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.46, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.7%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 78.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.1%).