Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,626,067 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 121.4 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 14.8%), per capita income ($45,043 compared to $51,361, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $108,149, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $55,028, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $43,317, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $66,087, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.1%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.0%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.52%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%).