Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,572,760 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.408% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to an increase of 408.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,218 compared to $51,361, a difference of 13.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,789 compared to $108,149, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($56,830 compared to $63,346, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $66,087, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $55,028, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($40,499 compared to $43,317, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.0%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.8%), master's degree (16.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.4%).