South American vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,343,691 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,114 compared to $51,361, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $63,346, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($101,856 compared to $118,053, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $55,028, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $43,317, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $66,087, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.9%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (46.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.5%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.78%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%).