Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Lithuania

Excellent
Exceptional
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,751,286 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.780% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 780.2 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $114,336, a difference of 2.2%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $63,346, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $66,087, a difference of 0.44%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $43,317, a difference of 0.59%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $52,769, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
28.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.37%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%