Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,192,840 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 200.9 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($111,378 compared to $118,053, a difference of 6.0%), median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $63,346, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $66,087, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $43,317, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($49,303 compared to $51,361, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.38%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.8%), bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.7%).